Sign Up
← Markets

Will Trump publicly insult someone on...?

Trump Vol. $31,486 50 traders

August 3100%
August 1100%
August 495%
August 2591%
$31,486 Vol. Trump

Outcomes

31
Chance
August 1 Resolved
90% ▲ 26
August 2 Resolved
1% ▼ 16
August 3 Resolved
90% ▲ 19
August 4
86% ▲ 12
August 5
82% ▼ 4
August 6
71% ▼ 2
August 7
70% ▼ 3
August 8
72% ▲ 3
August 9
77% ▲ 5
August 10
76%
August 11
75% ▼ 1
August 12
73% ▲ 3
August 13
75% ▼ 2
August 14
77% ▲ 1
August 15
76%
August 16
78%
August 17
79% ▲ 5
August 18
77% ▼ 2
August 19
82% ▼ 2
August 20
78%
August 21
76% ▼ 1
August 22
76% ▼ 1
August 23
75% ▼ 3
August 24
75% ▲ 1
August 25
83% ▼ 2
August 26
80% ▼ 2
August 27
78% ▲ 1
August 28
80% ▼ 1
August 29
79% ▼ 1
August 30
65% ▼ 6
August 31
77% ▲ 1

Recent trades

  • No recent trades

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes a public statement in which he insults any non-fictional individual on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Comments